The Philosophy of Psychokinesis

They had me until the supposition that the Big Bang explains interconnection.... I was recently enjoying learning from an IONS article, until this flawed premise made me snarky. And seriously, I’m doing some spontaneous IMPROV scholarship in this blog, entertaining myself to keep my energy flowing as I am trying to end 4+ months of homelessness trying to pitch my alma mater, Carnegie Mellon, to seed fund the vastly important Intellectual Property of #WellbeingPhilosophy

Here’s my comment and the flowing artistic-flow, stream of consciousness, she-Socrates-flow:

I have been learning the process of Bio-PK since infancy and put in my 10K hours in using it in collaboration with Micro-PK to generate a Macro-PK outcome.

I hadn't been 'viewing' the separate types of psychokinesis as part of the experiments to turn my theory into practice and I find these distinctions truly impactful.

As the founder of #WellbeingPhilosophy I know that we can all begin testing out Bio-psychokinesis or Bio-PK by using our thoughts to change our body state. While mediation is an ancient term and mindfulness is the current 'evidence based' term, when we we talk about positive thinking or affirmations, we are learning to enact Bio-psychokinesis.

This is a crucial component of reuniting the Cartesian split that separated mind and body within the Western thought tradition.

The complexity lies in the fact that we are unaware of all subconscious, autonomic brain body effects and our culture has atrophied a focus on the talent and skill of consciously or mindfully using our intention to change our body states.

Excerpt from the download associated with this teaser intro: https://noetic.org/blog/change-world-with-minds-psychokinesis-research/

“William Braud pioneered the most commonly used paradigm that demonstrates bio-PK called DMILS, or distant mental interactions among living systems, in 1977. In this paradigm, pairs of people are studied. One person, the “sender,” is placed in a booth with a live-stream, closed-circuit video screen that periodically shows the other person, the “receiver.” When the receiver’s image appears, the sender sends as much energy, compassion, intention, or attention

Cardiol Vasc Res, 2021 Special Issue: Ancient wisdom at Intersection with Modern Cardiac Sciences Volume 5 | Issue 1 | 1 of 7 Editor: Abdullah Alabdulgader MD, FRCP; Co-editor: Rollin McCraty, MD

as they can towards the receiver. Meanwhile, the “receiver” is sitting in a 2000 lb. electromagnetically shielded room and asked to simply relax and be open. While this sending and receiving occurs, the participant’s physiology is being simultaneously measured. One can then examine the physiology when the sender is sending versus not sending. Numerous laboratories have found that the receiver’s physiology changes when the sender is sending vs. not sending in this DMILS paradigm in dozens of experiments under different conditions. Most DMILS protocols were conducted with electro dermal activity (EDA) although a variety of other measures demonstrated similar results: blood volume pulse, brain blood oxygenation (fMRI) [3,4], electroencephalography (EEG) [4], and heart rate. “

Another Bio-electricity she-Sphinx question revealing another valid premise for the foundational truth that life force = consciousness = bio-electricity > why do we electromagnetically shield participants from each other if we don’t know that consciousness is bio-electrical?

Now, off, in real time, to continue this IMPROV blog on sorting the Hard Problem of Consciousness into an Easy Pivot, to hypothesize as to why the electromagnetic shielding does not prohibit communication between study participants.

This will be a douzy. By which I mean, this is a serious degree of difficulty line of inquiry that takes tesseracting or multi-dimensional thinking. First, discovering a faulty definition, then establishing the valid definition, then showing the restrictions of English, then synthesizing some similar valid condition of life on Earth.

(Just back from Blockchaining on LI, although, being food, water and electricity unsafe, it was hard to remember why I was focusing on spreading my links around, only to realize my controversial self could get banned by any private company….. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/debhelfrich_can-we-change-the-world-with-our-minds-activity-6836064572294754304-8NSn )

She shoots and she scores as she she-Chappelles into Standup Philosophy’s start-up phase >

https://youtu.be/0lXRVTcUwB0